-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: [AISWorld] 2nd CFP: CAIS Special Issue on the Literature
Review in Information Systems Research (LRiIS)
Datum: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:03:22 +0000
Von: Mary Tate <Mary.Tate(a)vuw.ac.nz>
An: 'aisworld(a)lists.aisnet.org' <aisworld(a)lists.aisnet.org>
*CALL FOR PAPERS*
*Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS):
Special Issue on the Literature Review in Information Systems Research
(LRiIS)*
*Paper Submission: 28 February 2014*
**
*Guest Editors*
*. Mary Tate, Victoria University of Wellington, New
Zealand mary.tate(a)vuw.ac.nz*
*. Elfi Furtmueller, Austrian Science Foundation
elfi.furtmueller(a)amc.or.at*
*. Wasana Bandara, Queensland University of Technology
w.bandara(a)qut.edu.au*
*. Joerg Evermann, Memorial University of Newfoundland
jevermann(a)mun.ca <mailto:jevermann@mun.ca>*
**
*A review of past literature is a crucial endeavour for any academic
research. An effective literature review can serve multiple purposes;
methodologically analyze and synthesize quality literature; provide a
firm foundation for a research topic and the selection of research
methodology; demonstrate that the proposed research contributes
something new to the overall body of knowledge or advances the research
field's knowledge base, and when relevant- propose a research agenda for
the topic under investigation. With all these important target outcomes,
clear guidelines and support processes are crucial for a comprehensive
and accurate literature review. These may vary depending on the nature
and purpose of the literature review. In addition, large, complex,
contradictory, or heterogeneous literatures may need a more
sophisticated treatment than the traditional "narrative synthesis".
While the importance of literature studies in the IS discipline is well
recognized, little attention has been paid to the underlying structure
and range of methods for conducting effective literature reviews.*
*It has been said that the narrative literature review popular in
Information Systems research suffers from "the god trick" of "seeing
everything from nowhere"; is subjective, such that two researchers may
arrive at different conclusions based on the same general body of
literature; and is backward looking, aimed at identifying "gaps" in
previous literature with a view to suggesting hypotheses or
propositions, rather than opening up new research questions or new areas
of enquiry. There are also risks in our current approach which include:
that predominantly subjective, narrative-based reviews are ineffective
in building a genuinely cumulative tradition, with knowledge "piling up"
rather than "building up"; and that valuable empirical knowledge can be
"trapped" (for example, in case studies) in forms that make it difficult
to extract and accumulate. *
*Our objectives in creating this special issue or section are to offer
alternative perspectives, approaches, and techniques for analyzing and
presenting research literature, AND to show how literature analysis
techniques can be used to accumulate disciplinary knowledge, generate
new research questions, and suggest new lines of research, as well as
supporting the development of propositions and hypotheses. We are
soliciting papers from all research perspectives. Note that this call
does not include literature reviews in a particular subject area, unless
the approach taken is novel and interesting. *
*Articles may adopt quantitative or qualitative approaches and use a
range of perspectives, methods or techniques. Articles may address the
whole life-cycle of a literature review from conceptualization through
selection, analysis and presentation; or may offer insights that are
specific to only one phase of the life-cycle. Both
conceptual/theoretical articles, and applied/tutorial articles are
welcome. We specifically invite submissions in the following areas. *
*Submissions to LRiIS Research*
.*Perspectives, methods, approaches or practices for conducting or
presenting literature. These may include, but are not limited to:
hermeneutics, soft systems analysis, grounded theory, historical
perspectives, revisionist approaches, ontologies, stylized facts, case
surveys, or other novel perspectives and methods. *
.*Tutorials related to LRiIS, for example, tutorials in conducting
meta-analysis, in-depth tool supported content analysis, Bayesian
analysis, or other tool support *
.*Workshop and Panel discussions and proceedings related to LRiIS*
*Indicative timeline*
*12 December 2013 First call for papers*
*28 February 2014 Paper submission*
*1 April 2014 Author notification -- first round*
*1 August 2014 Author revisions due*
*1 September 2014 Author notification -- second round*
*1 October 2014 Author revisions due*
*1 November 2014 Camera ready*
**
*To be considered for publication, papers must be submitted
electronically by February 28, 2014. Papers that pass the initial
screening will undergo no more than two rounds of revision. Papers not
accepted by the end of the second round of revision will be rejected.
Please contact the guest editors if you have any questions about the
suitability of your manuscript. *