20 Mar
2006
20 Mar
'06
5:41 p.m.
xotcl-bounces@alice.wu-wien.ac.at wrote on 03/20/2006 07:21:27 AM:
Kristoffer Lawson schrieb:
I'm also wondering what the name should be, to make it really clear. Is [my var] clear enough? or should it be [my normalisedVar]?
"my var" is not a good option, "my varname" would be better,
furthermore, "my method" is already defined, getting a good name with method seems messy. how about:
There's some semantic relationship between the two accessors, so it would be nice to have some overlap in their names. How about "my varname" and "my methodname"?
Scott