xotcl-bounces@alice.wu-wien.ac.at wrote on 03/20/2006 07:21:27 AM:

> Kristoffer Lawson schrieb:
>
> > I'm also wondering what the name should be, to make it really clear.  
> > Is [my var] clear enough? or should it be [my normalisedVar]?
>
> "my var" is not a good option, "my varname" would be better,
>
> furthermore, "my method" is already defined, getting a good name with
> method seems messy. how about:

There's some semantic relationship between the two accessors, so it would be nice to have some overlap in their names.  How about "my varname" and "my methodname"?  

Scott