[Xotcl] XOtcl 1.3 bug

Kristoffer Lawson setok at fishpool.com
Wed Oct 6 23:45:21 CEST 2004

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Gustaf Neumann wrote:

> Hi Attilio,
> if i would be Mr Spock, i would say "fascinating".
> The example can be simplified to:
>   set pippo 1
>   Object o
>   puts [o exists pippo]
>   Object o::p
>   puts [o exists pippo]
> and was like this already at least in 0.9 (in 2001),
> most likely as well in all versions supporting "exists".

Oop, I think I noticed something like this too but forgot to report it as 
I made a workaround. Bad me :-)

(Need to look at that segmentation fault thing again as soon as I have 
                               / http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/

More information about the Xotcl mailing list