Hi,
I am newer of XOTcl and I am evaluating the language for using it instead of Itcl in the new version of a large OSS Telecommunication sw project ranging from SDH/PDH, ip,atm and application level management.
XOTcl builded successfully on HP-UX 11 and SunSolaris 8 and was integrated easily it into a starkit.
My preliminary tests reveal this bug:
# define a C class with a name Class C -parameter {{name ""}}
# add a new parameter C parameter {{oid ""}}
# now inspect the parameters C info parameter {oid ""}
Whereas it would be: {name ""} {oid ""}
Best Regards Attilio
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it.
Thank you
www.telecomitalia.it
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 13:20, Attilio Dona wrote:
Hi,
I am newer of XOTcl and I am evaluating the language for using it instead of Itcl in the new version of a large OSS Telecommunication sw project ranging from SDH/PDH, ip,atm and application level management.
XOTcl builded successfully on HP-UX 11 and SunSolaris 8 and was integrated easily it into a starkit.
Hi Attilio, good to hear this.
My preliminary tests reveal this bug:
# define a C class with a name Class C -parameter {{name ""}}
# add a new parameter C parameter {{oid ""}}
# now inspect the parameters C info parameter {oid ""}
Whereas it would be: {name ""} {oid ""}
This is a known deficiency. info parameter returns currently the content of the last parameter argument.
Please use for the time being the following approach to add parameters (maybe define a proc for it).
Class C -parameter {{name ""}} ... # add a new parameter C parameter [concat [C info parameter] {{oid ""}}] ... C info parameter # ... returns: {name ""} {oid ""}
-gustaf neumann
PS: I am currently not completely happy with the parameter command, and started some time ago a few approaches to redo it, but these turned out to have other deficiencies. Known problems of the current implementation:
- "info parameter" is not truely introspective but returns the last string content (although, this is in most cases fine)
- the semantics of the method "parmeter" is different to other methods where one can specify multiple values. Look e.g. on the "mixin" method: one can remove mixins by issueing the mixin command again with a shorter list of values .... o mixin A B .... o mixin A In contrary to "mixin" another call of "parameter" adds a new one.
- for the same reason, one cannot remove a parameter through the parameter interface (although one can remove the instcmd and the default by hand)
I think, a better approach will be to use subobjects of the class to handle parameter semantics, but this will be most probably slower than the current version, which works quite well in a wide range of apps....
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you www.telecomitalia.it