New subject: XOTcl is great!!

5 Sep 2005

Taral schrieb:

> Hello,
>
> I recently came across XOTcl and found it very very useful. I am
> working on optimizing some legacy compiler code which is written in
> TCL. I would like to make it object-oritented and so I started
using
> XOTcl. So far I have found aouut 90% reduction in execution time.
> Overall I'm getting great performance by using XOTcl.

wow, this is an impressive number; good to hear that.

> I would like to Thank You guys for writing such a great library.
>
> Of course I have couple of questions for you. I will really
appreciate
> it if you can help me here.
>
> (1) Is there any way to all the objects or instances based on
> parameter value? For example, I would like to request object
names of
> all objects where given parameter's value is equal to 5.

There is no built-in support for this. a straigthforward approach
is the
following which might
be sufficient in many situations:

===========
# define method expr for all Objects, the operands are taken from
# the instance variables
Object instforward expr -objscope

# define method select with some abitrary tcl expression. All objects,
# for which the expression returns 1 are returned
Class instproc select {expr} {
  set result_list [list]
  foreach o [my allinstances] {
    if {![catch {$o expr $expr} result]} {
      puts "$o expr {$expr} -> $result"
      if {$result} {
    lappend result_list $o
      }
    }
  }
  return $result_list
}
===========

so, now we define a view classes and objects with some instance
variables

   Class C -parameter {{x 10}}
   Class D -superclass C

   C c1
   C c2 -x 11
   D d1 -x 100
   D d2
   D d3
   d3 unset x

finally, we try it out with some demo queries

   foreach q {
     {$x > 10}
     {$x >= 10}
     {$x < 1}
     {[string match *00* $x]}
   } {
     puts "C select $q --> {[lsort [C select $q]]}\n"
   }

Note that in this example, all instances of C are checked for the
expression, if
you use "... [Object select {$x > 10}]", all objects will be checked.

This approach might be good enough for small examples and medium
speed requirements. If you have larger number of objects, and you
cant
restrict the query to smaller classes, you should try to build an
index
based on associative arrays, which could replace the "allinstances"
in the code above.

> (2) Do you have more example code pieces? I would like to see more
> sample implementation to help me with the syntax. I'm also learning
> TCL language at the same time using XOTcl :)

i am sure, you have seen the tutorial and the examples in xotcl*/apps
and xotcl*/library. There are a few more on:

  http://mini.net/tcl/XOTcl
  http://wiki.tcl.tk/references/10971!

> (3) Is there any way to represent relationship across two
classes? For
> example, Class A is related to Class B with one-to-many
relationship.

  a few class/class relations and object/class relations are
maintained
by xotcl (e.g. superclass,
  class, mixins).  A start point might be ::xotcl::Relations,
which  is
used to implement a
  uniform interface to mixins (and instmixins ...), which allows to
specify "... mixin add ...",  #
  "... mixin delete ...", "... mixin set ...", etc. In principle, the
same interface could be used
  for application level relations as well...

In current applications, the classes use and maintain a list of
related
object/classes.
Often, it is conveniant to use aggregations to express 1:1 or 1:n
relationships.

> (4) If there is a way to define relationship, is it possible to
query
> objects of classes in the relationship? For example, I would like to
> get all the objects of Class B related to given object of Class A
> (like a1) across given one-to-many relationship. In this case result
> would be list of object handles of Class B that matches based on
given
> primary key (identifier) value between class A and B.

a good key identifier is the object name. see the following snipplet,
how such behavior
could be obtained. We define class A, which maintains the relationship
to some other
objects. if an instances exists that relates e.g. to object c1, we
could
check there some
properties with expr like above...

Class A -parameter {relates_to}

A a1
A a2

a1 set relates_to {c1 c2}

foreach o [A allinstances] {
  catch {
    if {[lsearch -exact [$o relates_to] c2] > -1} {
      puts "could check $o"
    }
  }
}

hope theses examples help a little.

-gustaf

PS: when i was writing this mail i saw that the classtack information
within methods called via the method "expr" is not correct. It will
be fixed in the next release....

>
> Please provide some guidance to implement above functionality
using XOTcl.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> May be in future I would like to contribute to XOTcl. I wish to
be in
> touch with you guys.
>
> Regards,
> Taral

Re: XOTcl is great!!