On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Neil Madden wrote:
Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
That is two fine. I would prefer to have lots of related classes being part of the same Tcl package. For that, I have to build a stub package which then includes the rest in the appropriate order (or using some kind of sub-packaging).
You should be able to handle this with a custom pkgIndex.tcl file. I would personally opt for the fine-grained packaging mechanism though, for more flexibility.
Yeah, a custom pkgIndex would be a good idea too. I'm not a big fan of the fine-grained mechanism myself. I prefer to just say 'I want this package and all the classes that go with it', instead of listening all the classes I will happen to need. I know some people do that in Java too, but I just find it grows into a long mess with time.