when compiling the distributed binaries. Is there a reason why not? It seems like it is a low cost (simply add the "-DUSE_TCL_STUBS" compile switch?) thing to do in order to get the benefit of distributing more widely usable binaries.
Thanks, Brian Theado
------_=_NextPart_001_01C15893.671068D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"> <TITLE>RE: xotcl and tclkit</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:07:31 +0200, Gustaf Neumann wrote:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> the xotcl binaries are built with tcl 8.3.2.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> therefore it should work without compiling only with</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> 8.3.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> however, when it is compiled with 8.4, it will work.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I remember that stubs support was recently added to xotcl.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>From the above, I gather stubs support is not being used</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>when compiling the distributed binaries. Is there a reason</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>why not? It seems like it is a low cost (simply add the </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>"-DUSE_TCL_STUBS" compile switch?) thing to do in order to</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>get the benefit of distributing more widely usable binaries.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>Brian Theado</FONT> </P>
</BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C15893.671068D0--