Just wanted to note a change I noticed from 0.83->0.84 which doesn't seem to be in the changes file? It's to do with abstract methods and code like the following:
Class Foo Foo abstract instproc blah {}
Class Bar -superclass Foo Bar instproc instproc blah { puts "blah" next }
With 0.83 this worked but it gives an error about an abstract method being called in 0.84. The reason the "next" is there in the first place is basically because if someone decides to add a class to the chain after Bar then the "next" commands will already be in place. Are there other arguments for/against the 0.84 model?
- ---------- = = ---------//--+ | / Kristoffer Lawson | www.fishpool.fi|.com +-> | setok@fishpool.com | - - --+------ |-- Fishpool Creations Ltd - / | +-------- = - - - = --------- /~setok/