On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 uwe.zdun@uni-essen.de wrote:
we could also merge components that are split across files into one documentation file. I'm not sure which solution is the best one ... what do you think?
I think the best behaviour would be a combination of the two given possibilities:
Each code file does get its own documentation file, but there is one package documentation file that lists which files are part of the packages. This document file would then link to the per-file document files.
KL> On another issue we have made Debian packages of XOTcl (0.82, but 0.83 is KL> on the way) if someone is interested.. They're not extensively tested but KL> they seem to work on the machines here. Probably candidates for merging KL> into the official Debian system at some later time.
great! if you like to maintain Debian packages & have a web page for them, we can link this page with the XOTcl download page?
Yeah, we should still test them on a clean machine and if that works then we can stick them up somewhere. I'll get back to you once we've done that. There shouldn't be any major problems anyway. I just did a "dpkg -i" for the 0.83 package and except for a minor issue with pkgIndex.tcl it seems to be working.
- ---------- = = ---------//--+ | / Kristoffer Lawson | www.fishpool.fi|.com +-> | setok@fishpool.com | - - --+------ |-- Fishpool Creations Ltd - / | +-------- = - - - = --------- /~setok/