8 Jan
2003
8 Jan
'03
3:46 p.m.
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 16:37, Adrian Wallaschek wrote:
Hi there!
I do like version numbers, but there is a "too much" in everything.
The x.y.z is perfectly well adopted by the OS community. In particular, most of the OS packages follow this major.minor.patch versioning scheme, right?
What is the deeper benefit of having the version number for xotcl recursively even inside the source-tree?
I see none, must admit.
When running xotcl-1.0.1/xotclsh I do find ..../xotcl-1.0 in the auto_path instead of the required/expected .../xotcl-1.0.1.
This is, indeed, a problem which should be fixed.
Cheers, Zoran