On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
I would not recommend this for the general usage, since
- as uwe pointed out - this is bypassing the xotcl dispatcher
an can lead to unexpected behavior (it is a defined behavior, but different from the variant without eval).
Yes, I let go of that assumption and implementation. It may be good to mention in the documentation that the eval really is intended for fields only (although it doesn't state anything about methods anyway, I was just playing around).
Anyway, thanks for the response.