5 Aug
2010
5 Aug
'10
12:49 p.m.
On 5 Aug 2010, at 13:38, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
For XOTcl 2.0, the behavior for this example is like in XOTcl 1.* (it has to be for compatibility for many one-liners out there), for the new syntax, you get an error message (... and, by default, one has to use "Car create c1" instead of "Car c1", since the latter is dangerous as well).
Yeah, I agree the latter is dangerous, if in a different way. Basically you can end up with really obscure bugs if you mistype "instproc" somewhere. I speak with experience :-)
Must get round to reading your papers on XOTcl 2.0. They're open and waiting for me to get round to them...
--
Kristoffer Lawson, Co-Founder, Scred // http://www.scred.com/