Ok, I've found a temporary workaround using
TestB create ::b -x 5
rather than
TestB ::b -x 5
Still, why doesn't the second approach work?
xotcl-bounces@alice.wu-wien.ac.at wrote on 11/15/2004 12:41:25 PM:
I'm using XOTcl 1.3.1. (I haven't upgraded to the 1.3.3 beta yet.)
I have a filter that does work before and after calls to "next". I'd
like
to make sure that the "after" code always gets called, so I'm using "catch" around my call to "next," a bit like this:
# do something before set err [catch {next} result] # do something afterThe problem is that in specific circumstances (when objects are constructed) the fact that "next" is called within "catch" is screwing things up. (The error I'm getting is "5", which is defined in XOTcl as "XOTCL_UNKNOWN".)
I can see why "catch" would get in the way, but so far I haven't found a
way around the problem. Does anyone have any ideas?
<snip>