"KL" == Kristoffer Lawson setok@fishpool.com writes:
KL> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 uwe.zdun@uni-essen.de wrote:
we could also merge components that are split across files into one documentation file. I'm not sure which solution is the best one ... what do you think?
KL> I think the best behaviour would be a combination of the two given KL> possibilities:
KL> Each code file does get its own documentation file, but there is one KL> package documentation file that lists which files are part of the KL> packages. This document file would then link to the per-file document KL> files.
yeah, that sounds sensible. I take a look at how we can realize this behavior conveniently ...
KL> On another issue we have made Debian packages of XOTcl (0.82, but 0.83 is KL> on the way) if someone is interested.. They're not extensively tested but KL> they seem to work on the machines here. Probably candidates for merging KL> into the official Debian system at some later time.
great! if you like to maintain Debian packages & have a web page for them, we can link this page with the XOTcl download page?
KL> Yeah, we should still test them on a clean machine and if that works KL> then we can stick them up somewhere. I'll get back to you once we've KL> done that. There shouldn't be any major problems anyway. I just KL> did a "dpkg -i" for the 0.83 package and except for a minor issue with KL> pkgIndex.tcl it seems to be working.
ok. just drop us a note, when you're through with it
--Uwe