Gustaf Neumann <neumann@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote on 05/08/2006 02:15:41 PM:


> So, the only restriction is that you are not allowed to remove the mixin
> from o
> in the BEFORE part of M2. If you remove M2 from the BEFORE part of
> M1, there won't be a problem, since foo of M2 won't be called. If you remove
> M2 in AFTER of M2 foo, there would not be a problem either, since "next"
> was alreday executed.

Your explanation is certainly consistent with the behavior I observed. Is this documented somewhere? It surprised me.

> PS: wouln't be conditional mixins a solution for your problem?

I don't know.  What do you mean by "conditional mixin"?  

Scott