Actually,…. I have a better idea, since I have to add the budget and finalise two diagrams before starting to review, edit, finalise EVERYTHING that I can.

Can you (all? or at least the ones that are available now), in between, please open the existing clean document, identify the parts that should be or can be reduced... highlight them with different colours:

let's say: red: must be reduced, orange: better to be reduced, yellow: reduced if needed green: don’t touch this

and send it to me? if there is a specific part that you feel comfortable to contribute in summarising it, please let me know.

Most probably, I don’t have time to review all your inputs, but at least a few inputs can be helpful to collectively identify what can be reduced.

Thanks and best, Soheil

--

Director Sustainable Computing Lab https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu/ Institute for Information Systems and New Media, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien) https://nm.wu.ac.at/human https://nm.wu.ac.at/human Lecturer Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna

On 20.10.2021, at 15:07, Soheil Human soheil.human@wu.ac.at wrote:

Dear Gabriele,

That’s very kind of you. I’ll get back to you and some of the other colleagues soon. I’m analysing the file and will let you know. In between, we will also receive the formatted clean from Boris that helps us to have a better perspective on the current length of the sections.

Thanks and beset, Soheil

--

Director Sustainable Computing Lab https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu/ Institute for Information Systems and New Media, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien) https://nm.wu.ac.at/human https://nm.wu.ac.at/human Lecturer Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna

...

On 20.10.2021, at 15:03, Gabriele LENZINI <Gabriele.Lenzini@uni.lu mailto:Gabriele.Lenzini@uni.lu> wrote:

Dear Soheil,

If you tell me to reduce one particular section, I can do (I call it “caffe expresso” revision, or in dramatic cases “caffe ristretto” revision); but I do not dare to do without authorization. Of course, I preserve the semantic but cutting the clutter at the extreme (as you saw in the risk table and methodology).

g.

From: EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium <eu-consenting_consortium-bounces@alice.wu.ac.at mailto:eu-consenting_consortium-bounces@alice.wu.ac.at> On Behalf Of Soheil Human Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 2:29 PM To: eu-consenting_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at mailto:eu-consenting_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at Subject: [WARNING: ATTACHMENT(S) MAY CONTAIN MALWARE][Eu-consenting_consortium] Clean-Main CoCoDAT

Dear all,

WE ARE ALMOST THERE! ;) => Now we need your inspirational minds to make this more concise, maybe! :D

Attached, I am sending you two documents. You can turn on track changes and work on the “Clean” main and send it back to soheil/petra/boris via email.

The document WITH_COMMENTS is just a reference and includes the last remaining comments, please do not use it anymore.

Boris and Petra need about two ours to provide us with an updated clean version which is formatted.

We also keep putting the latest stable version on our shared nextcloud. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT IT VIA YOUR BROWSER! NEVER!!!

You can download the clean version from the shared folder, add your suggestions (turn on the change tracker) and send it to us via email.

PLEASE SUPPORT US TO REDUCE THE PAGES. WE HAVE TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MANY EXTRA PAGES.

THANK YOU ALL, Cheers, Soheil

--

Director Sustainable Computing Lab https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu/ Institute for Information Systems and New Media, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien) https://nm.wu.ac.at/human https://nm.wu.ac.at/human Lecturer Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna

-- EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium mailing list EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at http://alice.wu.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/eu-consenting_consortium