Hi. Please check use-case#3 description and edit if its not consistent with your view. I've modified it based on previous emails and discussions from Signatu, Rigo, Soheil. I remain unaware of what was agreed at the end between you, so I've tried my best to consolidate all the terms I saw in texts.
Primary concerns that I've attempted to address: 1) this it too CMP specific, it doesn't show value to anyone else (including other CMP) --> I've indicated clear benefits to data controllers, innovation for CMPs using signals, and for individuals to make requests (rather than other way around) 2) it doesn't consider users --> see point about individuals can make requests proactively 3) It should not be a repeat of T4.1 where data controllers UI/UX is developed --> I've shown clear advancement from those in terms of improvements and new developments 4) How does project benefit --> I've made it implicit where 'signatu secret sauce' is applied to avoid controversies over who gets benefit, and instead put making project stuff more efficient as an objective
Regards,
eu-consenting_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at