Jon,
Looking at WP4, I realize this pilot 3 is related (at least) to:
T4.1 Data controllers’, data processors’, and CMPs’ management framework
And
T4.3 Functional Dynamic-Cognitive-Semantic User Interface (DCS-UI) Prototypes for trusted end user devices
These tasks run from Mo 13 to 32, with deliverables at Mo 32.
=> it will be available at the very end of the project, so I think it’s wiser to leave it as Pilot/use-case 3, not the 1st one.
But once again, in my view, it’s already part of use-cases 1 and 2 and will be in the final Frameworks (rather than the two PoC).
Cheers,
Vincent
Le 15 oct. 2021 à 15:50, Jon Stephansen / Signatu <
jon@signatu.com> a écrit :
Hello Vincent,
Thank you for this.
Harsh proposed that CMP should be a standalone use-case to make sure that the CMP is best placed, and that the criteria are best defined for the smart car and smart city use-cases. The metadata analysis will also feed directly into this.
It might be best to have the CMP as case1 and then Smart Car as case2 and Smart City as case3.
It is our understanding that Rigo was enthusiastic about this too. We've discussed this in the meetings as well, and Signatu have confirmed that this is OK for Signatu.
Harsh and Rigo - please let us know if this is in line with your understanding.
Regards
Jon
Rigo, Jon,
As is, this Pilot 3 is strange because:
- it does not define a clear use case (it's more a general need),
- it’s obvious to me that Signatu will « integrate solutions developed within CoCoDat with their existing solutions ».
In fact I thought it was already part of WP3/4 deliverables and integrated in use cases 1 and 2.
We do need the features, but do we need it as a well identified separate pilot?
Should it be integrated in T5.3 « cross case integration and studies »?
It would than be less visible but still present in WP5.
What do you think?
And yes, if this is a pilot, we need to update WP5 accordingly. I haven’t done anything so far.
Cheers,
Vincent
> Le 14 oct. 2021 à 20:42, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> a écrit :
>
> Jon,
>
> in the goals section of case 3 we wanted to implement a generic permission
> application (like the secure confirmation apps in banking) to grant
> permissions. This is needed in use case one and 2, but could be a central
> goal for the support of the SMEs you mention in case 3.
>
> I don't want to introduce text before I have some agreement. We need to
> make space for Uni-Luxembourg who will provide lots of insight in UX and
> has lots of resources there. This is currently not reflected in the use
> cases. IMHO, having a consent app may be central to that.
>
> --Rigo
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 17:18 +0100, Jon Stephansen / Signatu wrote:
>> Hello Vincent,
>>
>> Both Georg and I have reviewed your *current state* and *goals*
>> description and we think it's a great improvement. We are happy to use
>> it as the basis of what's required of Signatu.
>>
>> If an updated and new illustration is required, we can put that together
>> tomorrow.
>
>
>