Rigo
Signatu is built as a platform.
On top we can build apps.
Hence, an app for data subjects to permit car data sharing.
It would be good to understand what you want the app to do frontend (and backend).
Best regards Georg
15.10.2021 kl. 16:51 skrev Rigo Wenning rigo@w3.org:
Vincent,
the idea of the 3rd use case was to create an App on a mobile phone being able to make permission of consent without being actually in the smart city or car app. "Une sorte de secure pass" like in the french banking applications.
I have seen the description and it misses this cornerstone. But I can't write it, because I can't programme it. So I need buy in from Jon. In short, use case 3 is the Signatu - App. They describe the backend, but not the frontend (yet)
So all of the use case can then be also used with the App from use case 3. UC3 has no "instance data" case like the others, because it is generic. But it could be aligned with smart cities or smart cars.
--Rigo
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 15:02 +0200, Vincent Roca wrote: Rigo, Jon,
As is, this Pilot 3 is strange because:
- it does not define a clear use case (it's more a general need),
- it’s obvious to me that Signatu will « integrate solutions developed
within CoCoDat with their existing solutions ». In fact I thought it was already part of WP3/4 deliverables and integrated in use cases 1 and 2.
We do need the features, but do we need it as a well identified separate pilot? Should it be integrated in T5.3 « cross case integration and studies »? It would than be less visible but still present in WP5.
What do you think?
And yes, if this is a pilot, we need to update WP5 accordingly. I haven’t done anything so far.
Cheers,
Vincent
Le 14 oct. 2021 à 20:42, Rigo Wenning rigo@w3.org a écrit :
Jon,
in the goals section of case 3 we wanted to implement a generic permission application (like the secure confirmation apps in banking) to grant permissions. This is needed in use case one and 2, but could be a central goal for the support of the SMEs you mention in case 3.
I don't want to introduce text before I have some agreement. We need to make space for Uni-Luxembourg who will provide lots of insight in UX and has lots of resources there. This is currently not reflected in the use cases. IMHO, having a consent app may be central to that.
--Rigo
On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 17:18 +0100, Jon Stephansen / Signatu wrote:
Hello Vincent,
Both Georg and I have reviewed your *current state* and *goals* description and we think it's a great improvement. We are happy to use it as the basis of what's required of Signatu.
If an updated and new illustration is required, we can put that together tomorrow.
-- EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium mailing list EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at http://alice.wu.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/eu-consenting_consortium