Dear all,

Victor and I had a very constructive call today (thank you, Victor) and provided a set of suggestions for the project's objectives. I'd be most grateful if you kindly go through these objectives and improve them. 



Password:
consentIng?21

Here are some points to be considered:
* How can the objectives be improved?
* Are there any missing objectives?
* What are the contributions of our objectives to the specific outcomes and impacts that are expected (based on the text call)?
* What are the evaluation criteria for each of the objectives? How can we claim "objectively" that we were successful in the project?

(Please consider that the objectives’ texts are not finalised; but just a rough list of objectives.)

Thank you all,
See you tomorrow at 13:00,
Soheil 


--

Director
Sustainable Computing Lab
https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu

Institute for Information Systems and New Media,
Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien)
https://nm.wu.ac.at/human

Lecturer
Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna


On 08.09.2021, at 17:47, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es> wrote:

Dear Soheil,

I see this is a very good beginning, I would like to see now a numbered list of objectives (O1, O2...).
Reflecting on the text of the call (red color is mine):
ExpectedOutcome:
Projects are expected to contribute to some of the following expected outcomes:

  • Improved scalable and reliable privacy-preserving technologies for federated processing of personal data and their integration in real-world systems YES.
  • More user-friendly solutions for privacy-preserving processing of federated personal data registries by researchers YES, but we have to provide enough evidence!
  • Improving privacy-preserving technologies for cyber threat intelligence and data sharing solution YES
  • Contribution to promotion of GDPR compliant European data spaces for digital services and research (in synergy with topic DATA-01-2021 of Horizon Europe Cluster 4) DIFFICULT! How can we support the trivial claim "we will cooperate with..."? just with a bunch of support letters? organising workshops, tutorials or other events?
  • Strengthened European ecosystem of open source developers and researchers of privacy-preserving solutions DIFFICULT! Instead of targetting developers, I would say we can claim our efforts to support the ecosystem focus on the standardization of the necessary specifications.



Regards,
Víctor

El 08/09/2021 a las 15:20, Soheil Human escribió:
Dear all,

Hope you have a wonderful day! ;)

I have started to draft the project objectives here:


Password:
consentIng?21

It’s not yet finished (I will later finish it today—it’s a very busy day), but a draft of the most important part (i.e. the first paragraph) is there.

I’ll appreciate it if you kindly review it. Please either turn on the "track changes” or leave comments. 

Thanks a lot,
Cheers,
Soheil 


--

Director
Sustainable Computing Lab
https://www.sustainablecomputing.eu

Institute for Information Systems and New Media,
Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU Wien)
https://nm.wu.ac.at/human

Lecturer
Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna






-- 
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 910672914
Skype: vroddon3
http://cosasbuenas.es
--
EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium mailing list
EU-CONSENTiNG_consortium@alice.wu.ac.at
http://alice.wu.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/eu-consenting_consortium