-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [AISWorld] Call for Papers RIGiM'12 Workshop, in Conjunction with ER'12 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:23:17 -0500 From: Jennifer Horkoff jenhork@cs.utoronto.ca To: aisworld@lists.aisnet.org

** Call for Papers RIGiM'12**

4th International Workshop on Requirements, Intentions and Goals in Conceptual Modeling (RIGiM'12) in Conjunction with the 31st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'12) Florence, Italy

15-18th October, 2012

Paper submission deadline: April 23th, 2012

Web site: https://sites.google.com/site/rigim12/

** Organizers **

* Colette Rolland - Universite Paris 1 Pantheon - Sorbonne, France. * Jaelson Castro - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil. * Camille Salinesi - Universite Paris 1 Pantheon - Sorbonne, France. * Eric Yu - University of Toronto, Canada. * Jennifer Horkoff - University of Toronto, Canada.

** Scope and Topics ***

The use of intentional concepts, the notion of "goal" in particular, has been prominent in recent approaches to requirements engineering. Goal-oriented frameworks and methods for requirements engineering (GORE) have been keynote topics at requirements engineering conferences, and at major software engineering conferences. What are the conceptual modelling foundations in these approaches?

Traditionally information system engineering has made the assumption that an information system captures some excerpt of world history and hence has concentrated on modeling information about the Universe of Discourse. This is done through conceptual modeling that aims at abstracting the specification of the required information system, i.e., the conceptual schema, from an analysis of the relevant aspects of the Universe of Discourse about which the user community needs information. This specification concentrates on what the system should do, that is, on its functionality, serving as a prescription for system construction.

Whereas conceptual modelling allowed system developers to understand the semantic of information and led to a large number of semantically powerful conceptual models, experience demonstrates that it often fails in supporting the delivery of systems that were accepted by the community of users. Indeed, a number of studies have shown that many systems fail due to an inadequate understanding of the requirements they seek to address. Furthermore, the amount of effort needed to fix these systems has been found to be very high.

To correct this situation, it is necessary to view information systems as fulfilling some purpose in an organisation. Understanding purpose, goals, and intentions is a necessary condition for the design of successful systems. Conceptual modelling therefore needs to go beyond functionality requirements that specify the 'what', to encompass the deeper contextual understanding of the 'whys'. The 'why' questions are answered in terms of organisational objectives and the desires and motivations of stakeholders and participants. Modelling the 'whys' helps focus requirements elicitation, validation, and specification. Goal-oriented approaches in requirements engineering have emerged to meet this expectation.

The Workshop aims to provide a forum for discussing the interplay between requirements engineering and conceptual modeling, and in particular, to investigate how goal- and intention-driven approaches help in conceptualising purposeful systems. What are the fundamental objectives and premises of requirements engineering and conceptual modelling respectively, and how can they complement each other? What are the demands on conceptual modelling from the standpoint of requirements engineering? What conceptual modelling techniques can be further taken advantage of in requirements engineering? What are the upcoming modelling challenges and issues in GORE? What are the unresolved open questions? What lessons are there to be learnt from industrial experiences? What empirical data are there to support the cost-benefit analysis when adopting GORE methods? Are there applications domains or types of project settings for which goals and intentional approaches are particularly suitable or not suitable? What degree of formalization and automation or interactivity are feasible and appropriate for what types of participants during requirements engineering? e.g., business domain stakeholders, requirements modelers, ontology engineers, etc.

**Topics**

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

* modeling and semantics in GORE frameworks * analysis and reasoning with intentions and goals * ontological and epistemological foundations * cognitive, behavioral, and sociological perspectives * goals, scenarios, and business process modeling * goals and viewpoints, management of conflicts and inconsistencies * goals in requirements and design patterns * goals in reuse * goals and traceability * goals and aspects * change management, versioning and view management for GORE * visualization and tool support for GORE * software engineering process and organization for GORE * GORE and agile methods * GORE in distributed software development * GORE for COTS system development and selection * GORE for product families and high-variability software * GORE for adaptive systems and agile enterprise * comparison and evaluation of GORE approaches * industrial experiences and empirical studies * GORE for services design and engineering * GORE and business modeling and strategy reasoning * goal-oriented conceptual modeling for security, privacy, and trust * goal-oriented modeling for user experience and interaction design * goal-oriented modeling of system architecture * interaction and integration with other conceptual modeling paradigms, e.g., object-oriented and agent-oriented models * goal-oriented modeling for specific application domains - e.g., healthcare, e-government, mobile commerce, ambient intelligence, social media and networks

** Format and Duration **

We aim for a highly interactive forum. Discussants and discussion facilitators will be formally appointed for each paper and session, respectively, to ensure an atmosphere of productive interaction.

The working language is English. The workshop duration is three sessions (1.5 hours each)

Workshop proceedings will be published by Springer-Verlag in the LNCS series. Thus, authors must submit manuscripts using the Springer-Verlag LNCS style for Lecture Notes in Computer Science. See http://www.springer.de/comp/lncs/authors.html for style files and details.

** Types of papers **

We solicit three types of papers: full papers (10 pages max), position papers (6 pages max) and industrial problem statements (6 pages max) in LNCS format.

** Paper Submission **

Submission via easychair site: http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=rigim12

** Important Dates **

Paper submission: April 23th, 2012 Author notification: May 28th, 2012 Camera-ready: June 11, 2012

** Program Committee (to be confirmed) **

Daniel Amyot, University of Ottawa, Canada Annie Anton, University of Carolina, USA Mikio Aoyoma, Nanzan University, Japan Ian Alexander, Scenario Plus, United Kingdom Aybuke Arum, University of New South Wales, Australia Daniel Berry, University of Waterloo, Canada Sjaak Brinkkemper, Utrecht University , Netherland Luiz Cysneiros, York University , Canada Eric Dubois, Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor, Luxembourg Vincenzo Gervasi, University of Pisa , Italy Aditya K. Ghose, University of Wollongong , Australia Paolo Giogini, University of Trento, Italy Renata Guizzardi, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo (UFES), Brazil Patrick Heymans, University of Namur, Belgium Zhi Jin, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Haruhiko Kaiya, Shinshu University, JAPAN. Aneesh Krishna, University of Wollongong, Australia Regine Laleau, University Paris XII, France Axel van Lamsweerde, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium Julio Leite, Pontificia Universidade Catolica, Brazil Emmanuel Letier, University College of London Lin Liu, Tsinghua University, China Peri Loucopoulos, University of Manchester, United Kingdom John Mylopoulos, University of Toronto, Canada Bashar Nuseibeh, Open University, UK Andreas Opdahl, University of Bergen , Norway Anna Perini, FBK - Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy Barbara Pernici, Politecnico di Milano, Italy Yves Pigneur, HEC, Lausanne, Suisse Klaus Pohl, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany Jolita Ralyte, University of Geneva, Switzerland Motoshi Saeki, Tokyo Institute Of Technology, Japan Pnina Soffer, University of Haifa, Israel Sam Supakkul, Keane, An NTT DATA Company, USA Angelo Susi, FBK - Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy Yair Wand, University of British Columbia,Canada Roel Wieringa, University of Twente, Netherlands Carson Woo, University of British Columbia, Canada