-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [AISWorld] Contents of Volume 19, Issue 8 (August) Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), Official Publication of the Association for Information Systems Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 08:41:14 +0000 From: JAIS JAIS@comm.virginia.edu To: aisworld@lists.aisnet.org aisworld@lists.aisnet.org

Contents of Volume 19, Issue 8 (August) Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), Official Publication of the Association for Information Systems Published: Monthly Electronically ISSN: 1536-9323 Published by the Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, USA (http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/)

Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suprateek Sarker, University of Virginia, USA

Editorial

Learning from First-Generation Qualitative Approaches in the IS Discipline: An Evolutionary View and Some Implications for Authors and Evaluators (PART 1/2)

Suprateek Sarker, University of Virginia Xiao Xiao, Copenhagen Business School Tanya Beaulieu, Utah State University Allen S. Lee, Virginia Commonwealth University

Abstract

Qualitative research in the information systems (IS) discipline has come a long way, from being dismissed as “exploratory research” or “preresearch,” not worthy of being featured in “scientific” and authoritative journals in the discipline, to a state where such research is seen as legitimate and even welcome scholarship within much of the mainstream IS research community. Despite these very positive developments in line with the value of pluralism that our discipline has embraced, and the gradual inclusion of qualitative work in high-profile mainstream outlets, recent editorials have expressed concerns regarding the research community’s lack of awareness about the diverse nature of qualitative research and the apparent confusion regarding how these diverse approaches are different. Such confusion has led to a mismatch between the methodology-related expectations of evaluators and the methodological description provided by the authors (Conboy et al. 2012; Sarker et al. 2013a). To help make sense of the situation, in this editorial, we offer a critical commentary on the arena of qualitative research in the IS discipline. In viewing the adoption of qualitative research in the IS discipline as an evolutionary process, by highlighting key differences among various types of qualitative inquiry, and by drawing attention to lessons learned from the first-generation of qualitative approaches adopted in the IS discipline, we offer a number of implications for both authors and evaluators of qualitative manuscripts.

To obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below: Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss7/6 https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/4/ https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/1

Paper

Pricing in C2C Sharing Platforms

Stefen Zimmermann, University of Innsbruck Peter Angerer, University of Innsbruck Daniel Provin, University of Innsbruck Barrie R. Nault, University of Calgary

Abstract

Sharing platforms such as zilok.com enable sharing of durable goods among consumers, and seek to maximize profits by charging transaction-based platform fees. We develop a model in which consumers who have heterogeneous needs concerning the use of a durable good decide whether to purchase and share (i.e., be a lender) or borrow (i.e., be a borrower), and a monopoly sharing platform determines the platform fees. We find, first, that consumers with greater need to use a durable good purchase and share, and that consumers with lesser need borrow. Second, sharing platforms maximize profits only if the supply of a durable good matches demand—that is, the market must clear in order for platform fees to be profit maximizing. Third, the market-clearing condition requires lender and borrower fees are classic strategic complements. Fourth, to maintain the market-clearing condition, sharing platforms have to increase their lender fee or decrease their borrower fee in response to increases in the sharing price, increases in usage capacity, and decreases in the purchase price of a durable good, and vice versa. These findings indicate that commonly applied one-sided pricing models in sharing platforms can be improved.

To obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below: Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss7/6 https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/4/

Paper

Don’t Even Think About It! The Effects of Antineutralization, Informational, and Normative Communication on Information Security Compliance

Jordan B. Barlow, University of St. Thomas Merrill Warkentin, Mississippi State University Dustin Ormond, Creighton University Alan Dennis, Indiana University - Bloomington

Abstract

Organizations use security education, training, and awareness (SETA) programs to counter internal security threats and promote compliance with information security policies. Yet, employees often use neutralization techniques to rationalize noncompliant behavior. We investigated three theory-based communication approaches that can be incorporated into SETA programs to help increase compliance behavior: (1) informational communication designed to explain why policies are important; (2) normative communication designed to explain that other employees would not violate policies; and (3) antineutralization communication designed to inhibit rationalization. We conducted a repeated measures factorial design survey using a survey panel of full-time working adults provided by Qualtrics. Participants received a SETA communication with a combination of one to three persuasion statements (informational influence, normative influence statement, and/or an antineutralization), followed by a scenario description that asked for their intentions to comply with the security policy. We found that both informational (weakly) and antineutralization communication (strongly) decreased violation intentions, but that normative communication had no effect. In scenarios where neutralizations were explicitly suggested to participants, antineutralization communication was the only approach that worked. Our findings suggest that we need more research on SETA techniques that include antineutralization communication to understand how it influences behavior beyond informational and normative communication.

To obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below: Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss7/5 https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/3/

https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/3/

Paper

Impact of the Information Technology Unit on Information Technology-Embedded Product Innovation

Monideepa Tarafdar, Lancaster University Hüseyin Tanriverdi, University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Organizations increasingly embed IT into physical products to develop new product innovations. However, there is wide variance in the outcomes of the IT-embedded product (ITEP) innovation process. In this paper, we posit that the IT unit’s involvement in the ITEP innovation process could positively influence the outcomes. ITEP innovations become part of complex ecosystems in which they interact with their developers, customers, and other ITEPs. These developments suggest new roles for IT units of organizations. Yet, there is dearth of theory explaining how the IT unit of a firm could contribute to the firm’s development of ITEP innovations in ways to create customer value and improve firm performance. This paper seeks to address this gap. ITEP innovations present new challenges for organizations. This paper builds on complexity science to articulate the challenges and explain how the IT unit can increase an organization’s capacity to cope with them. First, the paper adopts Wheeler’s (2002) “net-enabled business innovation model” to structure the key stages of innovation that an organization goes through in developing new ITEPs. Second, the paper articulates IT-specific uncertainties and challenges entailed in each of the four stages. Third, the paper develops hypotheses explaining how the IT unit could increase the effectiveness of each stage by helping to address these uncertainties and challenges. Finally, the paper empirically tests and finds support for the hypotheses in a sample of 165 firms. The paper contributes to the literature on IT-enabled business innovations by developing and validating a new theoretical explanation of how IT units increase the effectiveness of the ITEP innovation process.

To obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below: Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss7/4 https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss8/2/

Xiao Xiao, PhD Managing Editor, Journal of the AIS jais@comm.virginia.edu _______________________________________________ AISWorld mailing list AISWorld@lists.aisnet.org