-------- Original Message --------
ACM 2012 http://acm2012.blogs.dsv.su.se/ attached to BPM 2012 conference
in Tallinn: http://bpm2012.ut.ee/
Important dates
----------------------
Submission deadline: 1 June 2012
Notification due 2 July 2012
Camera-ready submission deadline: 30 July 2012
Workshop: 3 September 2012
Goals
--------
While practitioners are trying to overcome the restrictions of workflow
thinking, the research on the topic is somewhat lagging. The goal of
this workshop is to bring together researchers and practitioners to
discuss theoretical and practical problems and solutions in the area of
non-workflow based approaches to BPM in general, and ACM (as a leading
movement) in particular. This workshop is aimed to promote new,
non-traditional ways of modelling and controlling business processes,
the ones that suit better the dynamic environment in which contemporary
enterprises and public organizations function.
Topics
--------
We strongly encourage the submissions reporting a synergy of innovative
research and best practices in the area of ACM and other non-workflow
approaches to BPM, including human-centric BPM, data-centric BPM,
knowledge-driven BPM, etc. Topics of interest include but are not
limited to:
- Analysis of situations where workflow-based systems do not fit;
reports on real-life cases where it has been revealed
- Theoretical views on business processes not based on the workflow that
can serve as a scientific basis for ACM
- Non-workflow based process modeling languages, and methodologies that
can be used in connection to development of ACM systems
- Comparative analysis of ACM vs Workflow-based systems and practices
- Usage of ACM in practice: Case studies and Experience reports
- Critical analysis of ACM state of the art (tools and practices) that
reveals challenges to overcome
- Comparative analysis of tools and applications that support ACM
- Level of automation achievable in ACM that does not convert ACM into
workflow
Submissions
-----------------
We invite submissions in the following categories:
- Position papers raising relevant questions in the workshop area,
identifying problems and providing a glimpse of solution for a given
problem. Representing a basis for discussion, a position paper does not
necessarily need to include solutions to its stated problems. Position
papers must not exceed 4 pages.
- Idea papers exploring the history, successes, and challenges for
various non-workflow approaches to BPM and outlining research roadmaps
for the future. Contrary to short position papers, idea papers should
provide the in-depth analysis of a problem, review its existing
solutions, demonstrate insufficiency of these solutions and suggest new
(yet unevaluated but well argued) solutions. Idea papers must not exceed
12 pages.
- Experience reports presenting challenges encountered in practice,
their related case studies, success and failure stories. An experience
report should clearly describe the working context, and focus on the
problem and on the lessons learned. Experience reports should be
complete and allow for rigorous testing of research theories methods and
tools. Experience reports must be limited to 5-12 pages.
- Research papers reporting original results in the area addressed by
the workshop. A research paper should clearly describe the problem
tackled, explore the relevant state of the art, describe the proposed
solution and provide a preliminary validation of this solution. Research
papers must not exceed 12 pages.
Papers have to present original research/practical contributions not
concurrently submitted elsewhere. All papers should be submitted in the
new LNBIP format (see http://www.springer.com/series/7911 for details).
The selection will consider relevance to the main topics as well as
potential to generate relevant discussions. To submit your paper,
please, follow the reference to the easychair submission system:
http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=acm2012
Guidelines for submissions: http://acm2012.blogs.dsv.su.se/guidelines/
Organization
------------------
ACM 2012 Organizing Committee
Irina Rychkova. University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France
Ilia Bider – Stockholm University/Ibissoft, Stockholm, Sweden
Keith Swenson – Fujitsu America, USA
Program Committee (to be extended)
Birger Andersson – DSV SU, Stockholm, Sweden
Ilia Bider – DSV SU/ibissoft , Stockholm, Sweden
Karsten Böhm – FH KufsteinTirol, University of Applied Sciences, Austria
Paul Johannesson – DSV SU, Stockholm, Sweden
Erik Perjons – DSV SU, Stockholm, Sweden
Gil Regev – Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Colette Rolland – University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France
Irina Rychkova – University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France
Gregor Scheithauer – Siemens AG
Keith Swenson – Fujitsu America, US
Lars Taxén – Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Alain Wegmann – Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
--
===============================================
Dr. Ilia Bider
Process- och systemutvecklingskonsult at ibissoft.se
Följ oss pĺ LinkedIn http://linkd.in/xpqlqa
ilia@ibissoft.se +46 70 942 78 38
Lector& Forskare at DSV.su.se
ilia@dsv.su.se
Creating an agile enterprise http://t.co/5nJdNBev
_______________________________________________
AISWorld mailing list
AISWorld@lists.aisnet.org