-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [WI] 2nd CFP: AMCIS 2012 Minitrack "Adoption, Diffusion, and Success of IT Project Management Methodologies" Datum: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:11:08 +0100 Von: Nils.Urbach@ebs.edu Antwort an: Nils.Urbach@ebs.edu An: wi@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
### Apologies for cross-postings ###
*************************************************
CALL FOR PAPERS
18th Americas Conference on Information Systems
Seattle, Washington, August 9-12, 2012 (http://amcis2012.aisnet.org/)
Track: IT Project Management
Mini-Track Title: Adoption, Diffusion, and Success of IT Project Management Methodologies
*************************************************
DESCRIPTION
Despite the overwhelming advantages of using IT Project Management methodologies (ITPM), organizations often struggle to realize the expected benefits. One of the reasons of this is the lack of acceptance of such methodologies from their actual users. For example, only 50% of organizations are actually able to make their staff use such methodologies [1]. In the context of software development, a project survey conducted by Russo et al. [2] showed that only 6% of organizations claim that their methodologies are always used as specified. Cicmil et al. [3] also found that resistance towards the acceptance of project management methodologies is high because the users do not have faith in the concept, fear power loss, or lack adequate training and support from upper management. Organizational theorists have long recognised that behavioural resistance of individuals against the use of new methodologies is because they might not share the goals of the organizations in which they work, and that exerts pressure on them to use the new methodologies [4]. As such, the roots of lacking methodology acceptance, lies – among other factors – in the failure to understand the attitudes of individuals towards using a methodology. Researchers and practitioners alike face challenges regarding the design, adoption, and success of ITPM methodologies. This lack of understanding ultimately leads to the development and implementation of methodologies that might be considered unsuitable, and are as a result rejected by individuals.
The objective of this mini-track is to foster research on ITPM methodologies by providing deeper insights into factors that affect their successful design, adoption, diffusion, and application. Researchers and practitioners interested in submitting papers for this mini-track are encouraged to explore ITPM methodologies, and related methods and tools – for example from a design or behavioral perspective. Papers may consider different units of analysis: individual, group, or organizational level.
SUGGESTED TOPICS
- Methodology engineering - Designing ITPM methodologies - Success and impact of ITPM methodology application - Acceptance and adoption of ITPM methodologies - Strategies to influence individuals to use ITPM methodologies - Change management practices regarding implementation and diffusion of new ITPM methodologies - Leadership, power and politics regarding use and success of ITPM methodologies - Role of knowledge management and networks in ITPM use and success - Implications of project outsourcing for ITPM methodologies - Management software that can help support the effective execution of ITPM methodologies (e.g., project management information systems etc.)
IMPORTANT DATES
January 2, 2012 Submission opens March 1, 2012 Submission deadline April 2, 2012 Notification of acceptance April 20, 2012 Final camera-ready copy due
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
All conference submissions will be double-blind, peer reviewed, and must be submitted using the online submission system at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/amcis2012. For complete instructions for authors and information about the conference, visit the AMCIS 2012 conference website at http://amcis2012.aisnet.org/after January 2, 2012.
MINI-TRACK CHAIRS Kunal Mohan, EBS Business School, Germany, kunal.mohan@ebs.edu Nils Urbach, EBS Business School, Germany, nils.Urbach@ebs.edu Anol Bhattacherjee, University of South Florida, USA, abhatt@usf.edu
REFERENCES
[1] R. L. Glass, "A Snapshot of Systems Development Practice," IEEE Softw., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 112-111, 1999. [2] N. L. Russo, R. Hightower, and J. M. Pearson, "The Failure of Methodologies to Meet the Needs of Current Development Environments," Proceedings of the British Computer Society’s Annual Conference on Information System Methodologies, pp. 387-393, 1996. [3] S. Cicmil, Z. Ðordevic, and S. Zivanovic, "Understanding the adoption of project management in Serbian organizations: Insights from an exploratory study.," Project Management Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 88-98, Mar. 2009. [4] M. P. Teodoro, "Bureaucratic Job Mobility and The Diffusion of Innovations," American Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, pp. 175-189, Jan. 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ EBS European Business School gemeinnuetzige GmbH, Amtsgericht Wiesbaden HRB 19951; Universitaet fuer Wirtschaft und Recht, Umsatzsteuer-ID DE 113891213; Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Hellmut K. Albrecht, Vorsitzender; Geschaeftsfuehrung: Professor Dr. Rolf D. Cremer, Präsident; Professor Dr. Rolf Tilmes, Dekan EBS Business School; Professor Dr. Dr. Gerrick Frhr. v. Hoyningen-Huene, Dekan EBS Law School; Georg Nikolaus Garlichs, Kanzler ------------------------------------------------------------------------