-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: [AISWorld] 3rd Call for Pre-ICIS SIGPhil Workshop: What does influential and useful research mean to the IS community? Datum: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:16:56 -0500 Von: Nik Rushdi Hassan nhassan@d.umn.edu An: AISWorld aisworld@lists.aisnet.org
Dear IS Colleagues,
Deadline for paper submissions to the SIGPhil Workshop is getting close (Oct 1). I'd like to invite you to the SIG Philosophy's popular workshop at ICIS in Dublin. This year, the workshop is organized as a Pre-ICIS event on Sunday, Dec 11, from 11:30am-6pm. The workshop's theme is on what the IS community considers to be "useful," "influential," and "valuable" academic research, following up on recent exchanges on this issue. We have an exciting line-up of speakers (see below) who will present findings from an ad-hoc committee and discuss the theme in detail. If you are looking for the latest developments in the philosophy of IS or your ICIS submission didn't quite get accepted, or just want to socialize with thought leaders in IS, please consider attending this workshop and perhaps submitting a paper (paper not required to attend workshop). Lunch and intelligent conversations included. Take advantage of early registration discount for the pre-ICIS program before Oct 4. The SIGPhil will be pleased to verify your participation for travel funding purposes.
*6th Pre-ICIS SIGPHIL Workshop What does influential and useful research mean to the IS community? Time for a paradigm shift*
The AIS Special Interest Group on Philosophy in Information Systems (AIS-SIGPHIL) will hold its 6th ICIS SIGPHIL Research Workshop as a Pre-ICIS program in Dublin, Ireland on Sunday, December 11, 2016 starting at 11:30am. Although labeled as a workshop, this event provides an opportunity to spend quality time with thought leaders of the IS community discussing important topics in an informal and friendly environment. Workshop Presenters and Organizing Committee (in alphabetical order)
Niels Bjørn-Andersen, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Jan vom Brocke, University of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein
Samir Chatterjee, Claremont Graduate University, USA
Robert Davison, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Nik Rushdi Hassan, University of Minnesota Duluth, USA
Matti Rossi, Aalto University, Finland.
Monica Tremblay, Florida International University, USA Workshop Theme
One of the AIS’s recent presidents (2013-2014), Jane Fedorowicz (2013), made “On the road to relevance,” her presidential manifesto, acknowledging that as a field, relevance is still a work in progress. This perennial issue is a favorite in journal articles, conferences and panels, and reemerged again, in a somewhat casual proposal to list the “most influential” IS research to date (Chatterjee 2016). What transpired instead was a seemingly endless firestorm of responses that spoke of how much this issue struck a chord with the IS community. The responses ranged from the IS field having significant impact on companies and on students to very little impact if any. The wide range of responses suggests that the IS community views “influence,” “usefulness,” or “value of research” in very different ways. The theme of this year’s SIGPhil workshop is to explore what influential, useful and valuable research means to the IS community so that we can agree on some principles that can move our collective effort in a positive direction. An ad hoc panel of distinguished IS scholars is working towards generating a broader understanding of “Influence” and will report some of their findings at the workshop.
The inaugural Debate Section of the Communications of the AIS that explored the issue of the “Value of IS research” (Hassan 2014) with seven experienced IS researchers (Avital 2014; Chiasson 2014; Frank 2014; Grover 2014; Johnston and Riemer 2014; Niederman 2014) also reached different conclusions. We are not alone. The organizational sciences fields now and again address this same problem regarding the impact of their own research, the latest round (Davis 2015) even questioning the goals of organizational research. Commercialization of ideas is obviously one measure of value and usefulness, but it appears that even for the experts, influence, usefulness and value may not be so apparent. One report stated that Google’s Larry Page, who was on the verge on starting his PhD, had no intention of creating a search engine (Battelle 2005). When he first stumbled on the idea of ranking a page on the Internet, he just thought that given the complexity of the Internet, it would be something useful. “My goals were to work on something that would be academically real and interesting,” he recalled, and that “there is no reason if you are doing academic work to work on things that are impractical” (p. 74). The goal of this workshop is to start this important conversation on influential and valuable academic research. Program
*Sun, Dec 11, 2016, Gresham Hotel, Room: O'Connell 2*
11:30am-12:30pm Lunch and Poster Session
12:30-12:45pm Introduction
12:45-1:30pm *Keynote Presentation by Prof. Samir Chatterjee. “Does IS research have influence? Findings from a community-wide study”*
1:30-2:45pm Panel discussion and Q&A by Niels Bjørn-Andersen, Monica Tremblay and Matti Rossi
2:45-3:00pm Coffee Break
3:00-3:45pm *Second Keynote Presentation by Prof. Dennis Galletta. “IS research has relevance: Let’s stop beating ourselves up.”*
3:45-4:45pm Panel Discussions and Q&A by Robert Davison, Nik Rushdi Hassan, and Jan vom Brocke
4:45-5:45pm Workshop paper presentations
5:45pm Workshop wrap-up Workshop Paper Reviews/Poster Session
We invite you to submit your philosophy-related works, or works-in-progress to be reviewed by selected discussants. Papers can be as short as 2 pages or full-length papers. Full-length papers are more likely to be accepted for presentations. Papers should be designed to encourage in-depth discussion during the workshop. Submitting authors will present their papers and discussants will be selected to discuss each paper. We are particularly interested in papers that are close to the theme of the workshop, in particular papers that address useful, influential and valuable in IS. However, we welcome all papers on any IS philosophy-related topics. Doctoral students and junior faculty members are especially encouraged to submit their research. Student papers will be given special consideration. The SIGPhil can provide written confirmation for authors needing support for conference travel. Submit all papers to the EasyChair conference site *“**https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icissigphil6* https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icissigphil6*” *by October 1st, 2016. This year, we add an additional feature where papers that are not presented can still be discussed in a poster session held over lunch. Papers presented during the workshop can be forwarded to the History and Philosophy section of the *Communications of the AIS* to be considered for publication.
*Important Information and dates:*
Register for ICIS Conference and workshop as early as possible
Workshop Registration Fee: Early registration $60/Regular $80 (Student $45/$65) includes lunch
Submission site: *https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icissigphil6* https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icissigphil6
Deadlines:
For workshop papers: October 1st, 2016
Decision on papers: October 15th, 2016
Discussant for papers appointed: TBD
SIGPhil Home Page: http://sigphil.wordpress.com References
Avital, M. 2014. "Constructing the Value of Information Systems Research," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:Art 42) pp. 817-822.
Battelle, J. 2005. *The Search*, London: Portfolio.
Chatterjee, S. 2016. "Most Influential IS Papers"* AISWorld Listserv*, Association for Information Systems, 2016
Chiasson, M. 2014. "Let’s Start Fooling Ourselves: Strategies for Manoeuvring within the Micro-Political Influences Surrounding Our Research Practices," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:Art 46) pp. 843-848.
Davis, G.F. 2015. "Editorial Essay: What Is Organizational Research For?," *Administrative Science Quarterly* (60:2) pp. 179–188.
Fedorowicz, J. 2013. "On the Road to Relevance." Association for Information Systems, Retrieved Sept 7, 2013, from http://ais.site-ym.com/news/138204/On-the-Road-to-Relevance-.htm
Frank, U. 2014. "Higher Value of Research," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:Art 43) pp. 823-828.
Grover, V. 2014. "Value of IS Research: Let’s Not Talk Crisis – but We Can Do Better," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:1 Art 45) pp. 837-842.
Hassan, N.R. 2014. "Value of IS Research: Is There a Crisis?," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:Art 41) pp. 801-816.
Johnston, R., and Riemer, K. 2014. "On Putting the Score Ahead of the Game," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:Art 47) pp. 849-856.
Niederman, F. 2014. "Responding to Hassan (2014): The Core, Social Value and IS, and Distinguishing Research Value," *Communications of the Association for Information Systems* (34:1 Art 44) pp. 829-836.