Subject: | [WI] CFP - Workshop on Empirical Research in Business Process Management (ER-BPM 2011) |
---|---|
Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:33:29 +1000 |
From: | Jan Recker <j.recker@qut.edu.au> |
To: | wi@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de <wi@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> |
Call for Papers
2nd Int’l. Workshop on
Empirical Research in
Business Process Management (ER-BPM 2011)
in conjunction with
9th Int'l. Conf. on
Business Process Management (BPM
2011) in Clermont-Ferrand, France
I. Workshop Theme and
Goals:
Providing effective IT
support for business
processes has become crucial for enterprises to stay
competitive in their
market. In response to this need numerous process support
paradigms (e.g.,
workflow management, service flow management, case handling),
process
specification standards (e.g., WS-BPEL, BPML, BPMN), process
tools (e.g., ARIS
Toolset, Tibco Staffware, FLOWer) and supporting methods have
emerged in recent
years. Summarized under the term “Business Process Management”
(BPM), these
paradigms, standards, tools, and methods have become a
success-critical
instrument for improving process performance.
Research in the area of
BPM has traditionally
focused on the development and extension of associated tools,
methods,
standards and technologies. However, when evaluating the
suitability of
existing BPM technology for a particular project, it is
important for
practitioners and academics alike to have an informed opinion
about their
qualities and deficiencies. In particular, the demand for
insights or
evaluations of BPM technology based on empirical research has
only recently
gained prominence in the community. This is surprising as the
benefits of
empirical research have been demonstrated in areas like
software engineering
(e.g., in the context of software development processes or
code reviews),
information systems, or, indeed, business for a long time. In
fact, from the
introduction of empirical research methods such as
experimental or case study
methods into BPM (as well as into the development of
process-aware information
systems), we expect more valid, quantitative or qualitative
data on the various
aspects and effects of BPM technology. This becomes important,
not only for IT
professionals, but also for researchers dealing with
analytical, theoretical or
technical challenges in the field of BPM.
Our ER-BPM’11
workshop addresses this demand and
seeks to stimulate empirical research that, in turn, can
contribute to a better
understanding of the problems, challenges and existing
solutions in the BPM
field. In particular, the proposed workshop shall provide an
interdisciplinary
forum for both researchers and practitioners to improve the
understanding of
BPM-specific requirements, methods and theories, tools and
techniques.
Therefore, the ER- BPM’11 workshop will deal with different
facets of applying
and using BPM methods and technologies; and it will give new
insights into the
challenges, applications, and perspectives emerging for BPM
technology.
II. Relevant topics
include but are not limited to:
- Empirical research on
BPM methods, BPM technologies,
BPM tools
- Empirical research on
process-aware information
systems
- BPM-related
(software) experiments
- BPM-related action
research
- BPM-related surveys
- BPM-related case
studies
- BPM-related
experience reports
- Critical success
factor analyses of BPM methods,
BPM technologies, BPM tools
- Evaluations and
comparisons of BPM tools,
platforms and standards
- Frameworks for
quantitatively analyzing BPM
methods, BPM technologies, BPM tools
- Frameworks for
qualitatively evaluating BPM
methods, BPM technologies, BPM tools
- Requirements on
empirical and experimental BPM
research
- Usability and
ease-of-use of BPM technologies and
BPM tools
- User acceptance of
BPM projects
- BPM success, failure
and contingency models
- Studies on the role
of standards in practical BPM
projects
- Comparative studies
of BPM technology
- Empirical studies of
cross-organizational BPM
coordination and settings
- Costs, benefits, and
risks of applying BPM
methods, BPM technologies, and BPM tools
- Evaluation approaches
for BPM methods, BPM
technologies, and BPM tools
Practice-driven
challenges for future BPM research
- Reflections on the
use of empirical methods in the
BPM field
- Advances in empirical
methods for BPM research
III. Format of the
Workshop and Proceedings:
Papers have to present
original research
contributions not concurrently submitted elsewhere. We invite
position papers
(outlining research in progress), full research papers as well
as tool reports.
Length of full research papers must not exceed 12 pages.
Position papers and
tool reports should be no longer than 6 pages. There is no
possibility to buy
additional pages. The title page must contain an indication of
the submission
category. Papers should be submitted in the LNCS/LNBIP format
(http://www.springer.com/).
Only papers in English will be accepted.
Submitted papers will
be reviewed by at least three
members of the program committee and will be evaluated on the
basis of
significance, originality, technical quality, and exposition.
Papers should clearly
establish their research contribution and shall particularly
address the
relation to transferring BPM methods and technologies into
practice.
All accepted papers
will appear in the workshop
proceedings published by Springer-Verlag in the Lecture Notes
in Business
Information Processing (LNBIP) series. There will be a single
LNBIP volume
dedicated to the proceedings of all BPM workshops. As this
volume will appear
after the conference, there will be informal proceedings
during the workshop.
At least one author for
each accepted paper must
register for the workshop and present the paper.
IV. Paper Submission:
Papers must be
submitted via EasyChair:
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=erbpm2011
V. Important Dates:
- Deadline for workshop
paper submissions: 20 May
2011
- Notification of
Acceptance: 17 June 2011
- Camera-ready papers
deadline: 23 June 2011
- Workshop: 29 August
2011
VI. Organizers:
Bela Mutschler
(University of Applied Sciences
Ravensburg-Weingarten, Germany)
Email:
bela.mutschler@hs-weingarten.de
Jan Recker (Queensland
University of Technology,
Australia)
Email:
j.recker@qut.edu.au
Roel Wieringa
(University of Twente, The
Netherlands)
Email:
roelw@cs.utwente.nl